Summary: Socialists tend to believe in grandiose social engineering plans. Students who know too much, citizens who can think for themselves, tend to be a problem. What’s the answer? Talk a lot about education; but make sure nobody has much of it.
------------
All the way back in 1848 (the year Karl Marx published his Manifesto), Alexis de Tocqueville captured the essence of socialism in this short paragraph:
“Democracy extends the sphere of personal independence; socialism confines it. Democracy values each man at his highest; socialism makes of each man an agent, an instrument, a number. Democracy and socialism have but one thing in common—equality. But note well the difference. Democracy aims at equality in liberty. Socialism desires equality in constraint and in servitude.”
I don’t know how this Frenchman got so smart, but I’m comfortable with saying he wrote the book-- in only 57 words -- on this complex subject.
The key phrase is: “a number.” Socialism’s big promise is to turn you into a tiny cog in a huge machine. Nominally you’re a comrade; in reality you’ll be a serf or a slave. So socialism’s brave new world turns out to be filled with “constraint” and “servitude.” Are there people somewhere yearning for this?
Once you strip away the rhetoric and slogans, socialism is promising dirt. Who would willingly participate in this stupid project? Short answer: very few.
Long answer: very few who haven’t first been indoctrinated, frightened, lied to, or otherwise tricked into believing that less is more.
You might be already ahead of me. It’s easy to see now why “progressive educators” starting with Dewey circa 1900, George Counts and Harold Rugg in the 1930s, and all the rest of this gang to the present, ended up in the unsavory business of teaching less and less in order to prepare kids for socialism.
These so-called educators discovered a simple formula: the more people know, the more resistance they put up. (Values, traditions, history, religion, knowledge of whatever kind--these are the enemy.) Conversely, the less people know, the more easily they can be seduced into surrendering their freedom. Clearly, our progressive educators started from these nihilistic premises, and aimed for near-zero content in the schools.
You can look at everything Dewey said, all the way up to this year’s latest pronouncements on Constructivism, 21st-Century Skills and Authentic Assessment. You will find this perennial motif: kids don’t need all that factual stuff; teach less.
I’m reading a book about progressive education in the 1930s and 1940s; and it’s remarkable how relentless these fanatics were. The perfect school would be one devoted entirely to busy-work. Anything resembling a shred of foundational knowledge was sneered at.
The second part of the two-punch combination is to make sure that whatever is still taught is taught in a confused and incoherent way. That, for example, is a perfect short definition of New Math and Reform Math. The teachers go through the motions of teaching arithmetic; but few can do arithmetic. Similarly, with Whole Word, teachers can imagine that they teach reading; but few kids become fluent readers.
You see the pattern. There are classrooms, teachers, students, books, tests, grades--the whole panorama of things that might make you think you were looking at a school. You’re not looking at a school. It’s a laboratory for churning out humans who know very little and will therefore settle for very little.
I’m never sure whether to characterize these socialist educators as criminals or pipsqueaks. (Those mainly trying to help Russia win the Cold War were traitors.) In any case, they were horribly destructive. They worked systematically, with a great deal of intelligence and effort over many years, to make the schools as dumb as possible, in order to produce empty-headed, passive kids ready for socialism.
The good news is, schools did not one day get stupid all by themselves. Our faux-educators worked tirelessly at dumbing education down. Question: why can’t we do the opposite?
Our best revenge now is to see progressive/liberal educational thinking for what it is--non-education masquerading as education. Second, let’s clinically examine each idea they concocted (Whole Word, Reform Math, No Memorization, Self Esteem, and 50 others); carefully deconstruct these gimmicks; and confront why socialist ideologues would come up with such counter-productive methods. For these people, an idea was good to the extent that it impeded education.
I’m trying to describe what happened to our country so that we can undo the damage. Here’s how we start the healing process: understand the true goals of the education commissars, and that their unhelpful ideas were not about education at all, not as parents understand the term, but about social engineering.
Basically, progressives had one trick: putting sugar in the country’s gas tank.
Here’s a happy thought. If public schools simply went back to what was considered common-sensical and ordinary in, say, 1930, coupled with a clever use of all the new digital tools, I bet we could double the educational horsepower of the typical American school.
Now, to recapitulate, why do socialists hate education? Simple. It’s in the way.
(For related analysis, see “38: Saving Public Schools” on Improve-Education.org.)
| About Author Bruce Deitrick Price : |
|
Bruce Deitrick Price is the founder of http://www.Improve-Education.org, a high-level education and intellectual site. One focus is reading; see "42: Reading Resources." Price is an author, artist and poet. His fifth book is "THE EDUCATION ENIGMA--What Happened to American Education."
| |
Article Source: http://www.bharatbhasha.net
Article Url: http://www.bharatbhasha.net/politics.php/340509
Article Added on Thursday, January 26, 2012
| Other Articles by Bruce Deitrick Price | |
•Explaining the Cynicism of Our Top Educators
Summary: The premise of public education is that children will be educated and thereby lifted up to a better future. The reality is sometimes more cynical, as our elite educators scramble to promote their ideological agenda.
-------
Probably the most famous example of world-class cynicism is the wrought-metal sign above the gate into Auschwitz. Three German words: ARBEIT MACHT FREI (usually translated “work makes you free”).
The sign undoubtedly provided hope to many prisoners. (If we work...
•Here s What Happened to American Education The Really Short Version
I asked my doctor what he thought of President Obama’s proposals for health insurance.
The doctor shrugged with annoyance. Evidently he didn’t like the president’s approach.
The doctor remarked: “Obama’s saying, this is what’s good for you -- whether you like it or not.”
Hold that thought! It’s everything you need to know about American education for the past one hundred years.
John Dewey, universally acknowledged as the founder of American education, knew what was good for Americans. He...
•What Republicans Left Out of the Pledge Education
I read The Pledge to America with growing respect. It’s written clearly and directly. Some say it’s too long. But it does cover all the bases.
Except one.
Republican leaders don’t seem to understand that Education is a huge issue, a winning issue. Promise to fix the public schools. That is what the public wants to hear.
Education,” in the broadest sense, is the simplest way to understand why we have so many problems with our society and our schools.
Simply enough, the far-left took over...
•Education Site Uncovers Conspiracy in Educators O J Simpson And Guilt
The big question, when discussing American public education throughout the 20th century, is this: was there a conspiracy? A bold new article says YES.
“Many people shy away from the word conspiracy,” says education writer Bruce Price. “It’s a loaded word. People don’t want to think of the Education Establishment as a criminal enterprise.”
However, Price warns, there’s a problem. The relentless mediocrity, the compulsion toward dumbing down, the apparent inability to create world-class...
•Christine O Donnell Witchcraft And Education
(Summary: the big question is why the public schools waste so much time on weird non-academic topics, most of them hostile to traditional beliefs? The real witch in this story may be the Education Establishment.)
This is a story about a missed opportunity.
But first we have to ask what is the big deal? Still a teenager, O’Donnell dabbled in witchcraft; and then moved on. It shows she’s open to new ideas but doesn’t lose her perspective and become rigid. No wonder ideologues are upset with...
•Could the Education Establishment Be That Dumb
...
•Made Dumb in the USA
This country has a bizarre and unprecedented problem. “The longer American children are in school, the worse they perform compared to their international peers,” according to McKinsey and Company, management consultants.
Columnists at the New York Times have realized that the education crisis is grave. Tom Friedman said we’re falling off a cliff. Paul Krugman noticed our dilemma but wants to blame it on a lack of money, which is nonsense. Education budgets are massive. Here’s a better theory:...
•America s Most Urgent Business Aside From the Economy Improving the Public Schools
Public schools could do a lot better; everyone agrees. What nobody agrees about is the reason for their low performance. I call this mysterious mediocrity the education enigma. The question is: what the heck happened to American education? Remember, this country spends vast amounts of money on education, but somehow manages to create 50 million functional illiterates.
You might almost suspect that our Educational Establishment is not genuinely committed to education as most parents define that...
•Unholy Alliance Wrecks American Education
You can hardly imagine two people more different than John Dewey and John D. Rockefeller. But these two guys, and their assembled forces, joined in an unholy alliance that is still devastating American schools.
John Dewey, now considered our greatest educator, was a brainiac, a socialist, a nerd. In his pictures, he looks like a man who never played sports, understands nothing about business or finance, and doesn’t have a penny in the bank.
John D. Rockefeller, on the other hand, was one of...
•Public Schools Are Worse Than Most People Believe And Have Been For Much Longer Than Most People Realize
In all the comments I see left on internet articles about education, two themes dominate:
1) The first is, average Americans have no idea how bad the public schools are. The Education Establishment has done a brilliant job at PR and misinformation. They have tried to deceive the public; and the public is deceived. Unfortunately. So here are several quotes from some of the smartest, most successful people in the USA, people you should trust completely. And they are saying that educationally...
| | Click here to see More Articles by Bruce Deitrick Price
|
| |
